Deliverables & Publications

Work Package 1 – Empirical assessment of the effectiveness of past and existing policies


Berger, L., and Emmerling, J., 2017: Welfare as Simple(x) Equity Equivalents. FEEM Nota Di Lavoro. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, March 2017

Bezerra et al., 2017, The power of light: socio-economic and environmental implications of  rural electrification program in Brazil. Environ. Res. Lett., Vol 12, 9.

Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Suzuki, M. and Antal, M., 2017: Comparing electricity transitions: A historical analysis of nuclear, wind and solar power in Germany and Japan. Energy Policy Vol 101 612-628. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.044

Guo, F. and Pachauri, S., 2017: China’s Green Lights Program: A review and assessment. Energy Policy Vol 110 31–39.

Pahle, M., Pachauri, S. and Steinbacher, K., 2016: Can the Green Economy deliver it all? Experiences of renewable energy policies with socio-economic objectives. Applied Energy 179, 1331-1341 doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.073

Rao, N. and Pachauri, S., 2017:  Energy access and living standards: some observations on recent trends. Environmental Research Letters 12 025011 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa5b0d

Work Package 2 – Assessment of international country pledges, national action plans and development policies


D2.1 Climate mitigation policies in the context of sustainable development


Rogelj, J., Fricko, O., Meinshausen, M., Krey, V., Zilliacus, J., & Riahi, K., 2017: Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties. Nature Communications 15748 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15748

Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K. and Meinshausen, M., 2016: Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631-639 doi:10.1038/nature18307

Work Package 3 – Coherent national and global low-carbon development pathways

Global model protocol

Global low-carbon development pathways protocol second round – June 2017

Rogelj, J., et al. 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C.  Nature Climate Change doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3

Kriegler et al. 2018: Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0457

Work Package 4 – Climate change as part of the broader development agenda – Systematic assessment of synergies and trade-offs between multiple policy objectives


Fricko, O., Parkinson, S., Johnson, N., Strubegger, M., van Vliet, M. and Riahi, K., 2016: Energy sector water use implications of a 2°C climate policy. Environmental Research Letters 11 034011 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034011

von Stechow, C., Minx, J., Riahi, K., Jewell, J., McCollum, D., Callaghan, M., Bertram, C., Luderer, G. and Baiocchi, G., 2016: 2°C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall? Environmental Research Letters 11 034022 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034022


D4.1 Report on model harmonisation and development to represent multiple policy objectives

Work Package 6 – Capacity building, dissemination and stakeholder engagement


D6.2 Dissemination and communication plan

Work Package 7 – Project management


D7.2 Data management plan